{"id":73023,"date":"2020-03-04T13:25:12","date_gmt":"2020-03-04T18:25:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/?p=73023"},"modified":"2020-03-04T13:25:12","modified_gmt":"2020-03-04T18:25:12","slug":"huds-proposed-affh-rule-would-set-back-years-of-progress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/huds-proposed-affh-rule-would-set-back-years-of-progress\/","title":{"rendered":"HUD\u2019s Proposed AFFH Rule Would Set Back Years of Progress"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Rule was created in 2015 as a promising new rule under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) to increase local accountability with affordable housing funds. However, earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hud.gov\/press\/press_releases_media_advisories\/HUD_No_20_002\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">proposed a new AFFH rule<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that would reverse years of progress by no longer enforcing meaningful community participation in the fair housing planning process. It would skirt substantive goals in the previous rule that addressed segregation, poverty and discrimination, and it would eliminate accountability for local cities, counties and states in their obligations to AFFH.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99196px;\"> online pharmacy <a href=\"https:\/\/dellavalleortho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/prednisolone.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">prednisolone<\/a> with best prices today in the USA <\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Most Americans were not taught in school that it was <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/business\/archive\/2014\/05\/the-racist-housing-policy-that-made-your-neighborhood\/371439\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">legalized racism<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that ensured people of color could not buy homes in quality neighborhoods in the United States. Most Americans are unaware that federal, state and local laws <a href=\"\/how-1930s-discrimination-shaped-inequality-in-todays-cities\/\">intentionally prevented people of color from buying homes<\/a> \u2013 homes that were made readily available and affordable for White people.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As suburbs were built in the 1940\u2019s, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/cdn.loc.gov\/service\/ll\/usrep\/usrep334\/usrep334001\/usrep334001.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">discrimination and racism in housing was legal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Only White families were legally allowed to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.citylab.com\/equity\/2015\/09\/how-the-federal-government-built-white-suburbia\/403321\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">purchase these new suburban homes<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> with lucrative mortgages that nearly always resulted in instant equity. White homeowners enjoyed new, beautiful neighborhoods, good schools, solid infrastructure, thriving businesses and the ability to build generational wealth through the gains made from purchasing a home. Black families were purposely cordoned off from these suburbs and restricted to neighborhoods with inadequate infrastructure, undersupported schools, struggling businesses and a lack of access to living wages, fresh food, clean water and banking services. Subsequently, people of color could not build the generational wealth that millions of White Americans now enjoy from their grandparents\u2019 accessibility to homeownership in well-financed neighborhoods.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The murder of Martin Luther King, Jr., in April 1968, coupled with frustrations from poverty and injustice, resulted in protests and fires breaking out in poor neighborhoods and cities across the country. FHA <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hud.gov\/program_offices\/fair_housing_equal_opp\/aboutfheo\/history\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">passed seven days later<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and housing discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion and gender became illegal. Later, familial status and disability were added for a total of seven protected classes. FHA was purposefully race-conscious. It recognized that intentional, legal segregation deeply harmed communities of color and required all federal agencies, their contractors and grantees \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hudexchange.info\/programs\/affh\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">affirmatively further fair housing<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d to rectify the harm imposed upon people of color and other protected classes.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Combatting the harmful effects of discrimination and segregation is at the heart of the AFFH obligation within the Fair Housing Act. The 2015 AFFH rule furthered this mission directly by requiring participating programs to submit an assessment of fair housing (AFH) that explicitly addressed AFFH for the seven protected classes under FHA. The idea was to not only stop discrimination and harm to those in segregated, poor communities but to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hudexchange.info\/programs\/affh\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">actively and affirmatively invest in people of color<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and their homes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, the new rule proposal would remove the requirement for programs to submit an AFH even though HUD does not currently require programs to address discrimination against protected classes in other required housing and community development plans.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The AFH was the main mechanism communities had to ensure the local allocations of federal funding from HUD, like Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) dollars, actually go to the people and places that are harmed by discrimination and injustice. Until the AFFH Rule was promulgated in 2015,, most communities did not have a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gao.gov\/new.items\/d10905.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">meaningful fair housing planning process<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Often, the HUD funding and CDBG dollars intended for poor, segregated communities were instead used to make thriving White communities even better without many consequences. The new rule proposal would return to such a state by removing the obligation of programs to give the public broad opportunities to involve themselves in the development of an AFH and consult with constituent organizations that represent members of protected classes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A criticism from HUD is that the 2015 AFFH Rule adds \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.housingfinance.com\/article\/ben-carson-moves-to-change-fair-housing-rule_c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">unworkable requirements<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d for community groups that they are unable to fulfill. On the contrary, it imposed no specifications on the form and number of goals or the measurements to be used in assessing progress. Additionally, HUD approval did not punish local jurisdictions for submitting inadequate and incomplete AFHs. Rather, the rule was centered around a review and approval process that allowed applications to receive feedback, undergo revisions and be resubmitted with stronger, more comprehensive assessment procedures. The 2015 AFFH is structured as a critical planning tool to help local governments understand and find solutions for inequities in their communities by providing them with the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.texasappleseed.org\/sites\/default\/files\/10-15-18%20Appleseed-Texas%20Housers%20Comments%20on%20AFFH%20ANPR.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">flexibility to create goals and assessment measurements based on variations in local conditions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. In fact, the proposed rule does the opposite of this; it creates a standardized list of \u201cobstacles\u201d that can be used in AFFH, a majority of which <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nlihc.org\/sites\/default\/files\/NLIHC-Summary-and-Analysis-of-2020-Proposed-AFFH-Rule.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">only address housing affordability and supply but not discrimination<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> against protected classes. This is an inaccurate and inadequate prescription to address racial segregation. The proposed rule would also replace fair housing requirements with \u201chousing choice\u201d requirements. This means that fair housing quotas can be met <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nlihc.org\/sites\/default\/files\/NLIHC-Summary-and-Analysis-of-2020-Proposed-AFFH-Rule.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">simply by eliminating regulations<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> such as permitting requirements, design standards and building codes meant to protect homeowners and vulnerable populations. Unfortunately, simply increasing the incentives to supply affordable housing does not guarantee that local and regional housing patterns will desegregate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99196px;\"> online pharmacy <a href=\"https:\/\/mainstreetcosmetic.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/ShortpixelBackups\/wp-content\/uploads\/neurontin.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">buy neurontin online<\/a> no prescription <\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Fair Housing Act\u2019s AFFH obligation is one of only a handful of tools that we have to rectify the horrors and massive injustices of past legalized housing discrimination. Ensuring the AFFH rule creates access to opportunity for those that have been harmed by decades of legalized discrimination and exploitation is the goal of NCRC, our members and partners.\u00a0 Please sign on to our letter opposing the Trump Administration\u2019s rulemaking or make a comment at <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/document?D=HUD-2020-0011-0001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">regulations.gov<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Kristina Musante was NCRC&#8217;s director of the National Training Academy.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Maxim Applegate is a communications and development intern at NCRC.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Photo by\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/@libraryofcongress?utm_source=unsplash&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_content=creditCopyText\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Library of Congress<\/a>\u00a0on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/s\/photos\/protests?utm_source=unsplash&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_content=creditCopyText\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unsplash<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) proposed a new AFFH rule that would reverse years of progress by no longer enforcing meaningful community participation in the fair housing planning process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":951,"featured_media":73025,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_angie_page":false,"content-type":"","_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"default","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_EventAllDay":false,"_EventTimezone":"","_EventStartDate":"","_EventEndDate":"","_EventStartDateUTC":"","_EventEndDateUTC":"","_EventShowMap":false,"_EventShowMapLink":false,"_EventURL":"","_EventCost":"","_EventCostDescription":"","_EventCurrencySymbol":"","_EventCurrencyCode":"","_EventCurrencyPosition":"","_EventDateTimeSeparator":"","_EventTimeRangeSeparator":"","_EventOrganizerID":[],"_EventVenueID":[],"_OrganizerEmail":"","_OrganizerPhone":"","_OrganizerWebsite":"","_VenueAddress":"","_VenueCity":"","_VenueCountry":"","_VenueProvince":"","_VenueState":"","_VenueZip":"","_VenuePhone":"","_VenueURL":"","_VenueStateProvince":"","_VenueLat":"","_VenueLng":"","_VenueShowMap":false,"_VenueShowMapLink":false,"page_builder":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2421],"tags":[2486,1436,3123,2861,1674,1743,3124,3077,1147,1885,1290],"class_list":["post-73023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-views","tag-affh","tag-affirmatively-furthering-fair-housing","tag-community-development-block-grant","tag-department-of-housing-and-urban-development","tag-discrimination","tag-fair-housing-act","tag-fair-housing-planning","tag-feature","tag-featured","tag-hud","tag-racism"],"acf":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-scaled.jpg",1600,1066,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-150x100.jpg",150,100,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-300x200.jpg",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-768x512.jpg",768,512,true],"large":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-1024x682.jpg",1024,682,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-1536x1023.jpg",1536,1023,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/library-of-congress-WzPxmB_tRlw-unsplash-2048x1364.jpg",2048,1364,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Kristina Musante and Maxim Applegate","author_link":""},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) proposed a new AFFH rule that would reverse years of progress by no longer enforcing meaningful community participation in the fair housing planning process.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/951"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73023\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncrc.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}